This weekend I watched Clichy have a stinker, Gallas play for the spurs and Ashley Cole have one of the games of his life.. And it got me thinking!!!!
So who got the better deal when we swap Ashley for Gallas?
With Clichy getting worst each year and will Gallas leaving us for the spuds on a free, it kills me to watch Ashley Cole looking like the worlds best left back.
Lets get this right, BOTH Ashley Cole & William Gallas are nasty so and so…
But Arsenal should have done more to keep an English home-grown player happy at the club then sign a player (Gallas) with a history of having a bad attitude.
Looking back at the deal now its clear that Arsenal were shafted with this deal, And this has to be the worst bit of business under Arsene Wenger?
Maybe its time to give Gibbs a chance at LB ahead of Clichy?
By Jason Goldstein
Debate this more on our forum – www.arsenalaction.com/forum/
- Atletico Madrid interested in signing Alexandre Lacazette
- Arsenal’s midfield dilemma: What can be done?
- Arsenal transfer round-up: Ramsdale, White
- The striker dilemma at Arsenal
- Arsenal beat Milwall behind closed doors: Match report and Player Ratings
- Five alternatives Arsenal can sign instead of James Maddison
- Arsenal agree contract extension with Emile Smith Rowe
- Tammy Abraham to Arsenal: Do the Gunners need him?
- Arsenal cancel pre-season trip to US
- Lesson from pre-season: What did Arsenal learn?